THE IMPACT OF INNOVATION ACTIVITY ON THE INVESTMENT VALUE OF A BUSINESS: EVIDENCE FROM SMALL SERVICE ENTERPRISES IN SAMARKAND, UZBEKISTAN

Main Article Content

Dilshod Farhadovich Nasirov
Shaxriyor Baxtiyorbekovich Toshpulatov
Suxrob Paxlavonovich Talatov
Faxriddin Ulmasovich Abduazizov

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between innovation activity and the investment value of small service enterprises in Samarkand, Uzbekistan. While innovation is widely promoted as a driver of competitiveness, its direct impact on business valuation—particularly in emerging Central Asian economies—remains underexplored. A survey of 20 small enterprises (cafés, beauty salons, photo studios, and IT service providers), supplemented by semi-structured interviews with owners and local investors, was conducted in May 2025. Investment value was assessed via three approaches: (1) owner–investor perceived valuation multiples (EV/EBITDA), (2) discounted cash flow (DCF) projections, and (3) willingness-to-invest (WTI) scores from mock investor panels. Results show a strong positive correlation between the breadth of innovation adoption (measured by Oslo Manual criteria) and investment value: enterprises implementing ≥2 types of innovation demonstrated, on average, a 24.7% higher EV/EBITDA multiple and 31% higher DCF-based valuation (p < 0.05). Product and process innovations showed the strongest marginal effects, while marketing innovations contributed mainly to perceived growth potential. Key mediating factors included improved cash flow predictability, reduced operational risk, and enhanced scalability—all critical for investor confidence. The findings confirm that even modest, low-cost innovations significantly enhance investment appeal in resource-constrained contexts. The study provides actionable insights for SME owners seeking valuation growth and for policymakers designing innovation-support instruments in Central Asia.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

2. Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022). Strategy for Innovative Development of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2022–2026 (Resolution No. 112). https://lex.uz/en/docs/6245110

3. Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset (2nd ed.). Wiley.

4. Nozimov, E., & Suyarova, S. (2025). IMPROVING AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE IN UZBEKISTAN: RISK MODELS AND NEW MECHANISMS. Integration of Innovative Education and Training, 1(4), 54-63.

5. Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press.

6. Guo, D., Jiang, K., & Zhang, L. (2020). Innovation and firm value: Evidence from Chinese SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119951.

7. OECD. (2018). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (4th ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en

8. Nozimov, E. (2025). FINANCING OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS FROM THE FUNDS OF THE FUND FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF UZBEKISTAN. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 1(3), 1292-1296.

9. State Committee on Tourism Development of Uzbekistan. (2024). Annual Tourism Report 2024. https://tourism.gov.uz

10. World Bank. (2023). Uzbekistan Economic Update: Supporting Private Sector-Led Growth. World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org